|
|
Post by orangeparka (MIA) on Oct 14, 2013 23:22:11 GMT -5
APPROVED
Okay, so the consensus on the TPEs seemed that people are generally against it, so we're gonna steer clear on that for now.
How do ya'll feel about the Minimum contract trading rule?
In the NBA, the Minimum Contract trading rule is that you can trade minimum contracts without matching salaries. For example, I would be able to trade a second round pick for a minimum contract without sending out any salary, and vice-versa.
The idea is that you can sign minimum contracts at any time anyway, regardless of whether you have cap space or not, so trading for one should follow the same.
|
|
|
|
Post by Myles (SAS) on Oct 15, 2013 1:34:01 GMT -5
I'm fully okay with both so long as both teams give good explanations still. These trades will be stricter on the explanations (at least the trading for nothing).
|
|
|
|
Post by bt (TOR) on Oct 15, 2013 3:17:19 GMT -5
No issues with the minimum contracts. That's easy to bring in and doesn't need monitoring.
|
|
|
|
Post by andrei (POR) on Oct 15, 2013 11:12:39 GMT -5
APPROVED  |
|
Lukc
General Manager
Posts: 227 
|
Post by Lukc on Oct 15, 2013 11:18:44 GMT -5
I'm fully okay with both so long as both teams give good explanations still. These trades will be stricter on the explanations (at least the trading for nothing). This |
|
|
|
Post by kgdobby (OKC) on Oct 15, 2013 12:44:17 GMT -5
I'm fine with this. Seems like it could be useful.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jamal (NYK) on Oct 16, 2013 4:05:47 GMT -5
#1 seems usefull and fair to RL to me.
I don't really get #2: Something like for example, I have a player that earns 10mil$ and want to get rid of, with this rule I would be able to trade him and let's say a 2nd round pick to a team with cap space that can absorb him for nothing? That way he 'pays' me getting that contract I don't want and I pay him with the 2nd round pick, but the deal is trully a player + a 2nd round for nothing?
|
|
|
|
Post by orangeparka (MIA) on Oct 16, 2013 4:18:20 GMT -5
#1 seems usefull and fair to RL to me. I don't really get #2: Something like for example, I have a player that earns 10mil$ and want to get rid of, with this rule I would be able to trade him and let's say a 2nd round pick to a team with cap space that can absorb him for nothing? That way he 'pays' me getting that contract I don't want and I pay him with the 2nd round pick, but the deal is trully a player + a 2nd round for nothing? Yes. I thought it wasn't allowed because on R2G it was illegal to trade for nothing, but that was never a rule here. |
|
|
|
Post by Jamal (NYK) on Oct 16, 2013 4:40:13 GMT -5
#1 seems usefull and fair to RL to me. I don't really get #2: Something like for example, I have a player that earns 10mil$ and want to get rid of, with this rule I would be able to trade him and let's say a 2nd round pick to a team with cap space that can absorb him for nothing? That way he 'pays' me getting that contract I don't want and I pay him with the 2nd round pick, but the deal is trully a player + a 2nd round for nothing? Yes. I thought it wasn't allowed because on R2G it was illegal to trade for nothing, but that was never a rule here. It could work then. Well explained makes it real, or at least the way I see it. Hopefully it isn't hard to implement in the game. I think you can always trade a pick for nothing in the game, so I guess it's the same with players, don't remember now. I also agree with #2 then |
|
|
|
Post by jestor on Oct 16, 2013 4:56:10 GMT -5
I haven't tested it with 3, but you could do it in 1. I imagine it would be the same, though. You'd just need to be in commissioner mode to be able to it as noted.
|
|
|
|
Post by billybucket on Oct 17, 2013 4:41:12 GMT -5
Sure why not
|
|
|
|
Post by BlackIce (ATL) on Oct 17, 2013 7:32:40 GMT -5
I don't see why not.
|
|
|
|
Post by orangeparka (MIA) on Oct 17, 2013 7:39:28 GMT -5
I'm fully okay with both so long as both teams give good explanations still. These trades will be stricter on the explanations (at least the trading for nothing). With commish approving it and not a single down-vote on this one, it looks like this one'll be implemented. |
|
|
|
Post by orangeparka (MIA) on Oct 23, 2013 0:23:23 GMT -5
Can we move this as officially approved?
|
|
|
|
Post by Myles (SAS) on Oct 23, 2013 0:32:16 GMT -5
Yes
|
|
